2001
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-01-05994-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On support points of univalent functions and a disproof of a conjecture of Bombieri

Abstract: Abstract. We consider the linear functional Re(a 3 + λa 2 ) for λ ∈ iR on the set of normalized univalent functions in the unit disk and use the result to disprove a conjecture of Bombieri.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For (m, n) = (3, 2), this property has been proved by Greiner and Roth in [49]. Such interpretation can serve to define a number σ mn (M ), M > 1, as a maximal number for which Re (a n − λa m ) is locally maximized on S(M ) by the Pick function P M (z) = M K −1 (K(z)/M ).…”
Section: ✷✼✷ ❮àó÷íûé îòäåëmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For (m, n) = (3, 2), this property has been proved by Greiner and Roth in [49]. Such interpretation can serve to define a number σ mn (M ), M > 1, as a maximal number for which Re (a n − λa m ) is locally maximized on S(M ) by the Pick function P M (z) = M K −1 (K(z)/M ).…”
Section: ✷✼✷ ❮àó÷íûé îòäåëmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Greiner and Roth [49] answered negatively to partial Bombieri's conjecture. They evaluated σ 32 showing that σ 32 < B 32 .…”
Section: ✷✼✷ ❮àó÷íûé îòäåëmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noteworthy that D. Bshouty and W. Hengartner [7] proved Bombieri's conjecture for functions from S having real coefficients in their Taylor's expansion. Continuing this contribution by D. Bshouty and W. Hengartner, the conjecture for the whole class S has been recently disproved by R. Greiner and O. Roth [9] for n = 2, m = 3, f ∈ S. Actually, they have got the sharp Bombieri number σ 32 = (e − 1)/4e < 1/4 = B 32 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…where the lim inf are taken over all functions f (z) = z + ∞ j=2 a j z j ∈ S. Recently, this conjecture has been disproved for n = 2 and m = 3 (cf. [13]) while the other cases are still open. We shall first show how the methods of Sections 1 and 2 can be used to give a short proof of:…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%