Abstract:We show that if f : M 3 → M 3 is an A-diffeomorphism with a surface two-dimensional attractor or repeller B and M 2 B is a supporting surface for B, then B = M 2 B and there is k ≥ 1 such that:i is homeomorphic to the 2-torus T 2 . 2) the restriction of f k to M 2 i (i ∈ {1, . . . , k}) is conjugate to Anosov automorphism of T 2 .
“…It follows from [11] and [18] that any manifold M 3 which admits structurally stable diffeomorphism → f M M : 3 3 with a two-dimensional expanding attractor (contracting repeller), is diffeomorphic to the torus T 3 and, moreover, f is topologically conjugated with the diffeomorphism obtained from the Anosov diffeomorphism by the generalized surgery operation. According to [9] each connected component of the two-dimensional surface basic set for A-diffeomorphism → f M M : 3 3 is homeomorphic to the torus and a restriction of some degree of f to this component is topologically conjugate with the Anosov diffeomorphism.…”
Section: Introduction and Formulation Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A contracting repeller of a diffeomorphism f is an expanding attractor of f −1 . According to [7], a basic set B of a diffeomorphism…”
Section: A Basic Set B Of F Is An Attractor (Repeller) If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface B M 2 is called the support of B. The following statement on surface basic sets follows from [9]. 3 3 the following holds:…”
Section: A Basic Set B Of F Is An Attractor (Repeller) If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B has type (2, 1) ((1, 2)) and, therefore, is not an expanding attractor (an contracting repeller). B coincides with its support and is a finite union of manifolds tamely embedded 6 in M 3 and homeomorphic to the 2-torus 7 . the restriction of B f k to any connected component of the support is conjugated to some hyperbolic automorphism of the torus.…”
Section: Statement 2 For Any Two-dimensional Surface Attractor (Repementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise the embedding λ is said to be wild and the manifold X is said to be wildly embedded. 7 It should be emphasized that the support of a two-dimensional surface basic set is not necessarily smooth (the corresponding example is given in [15]). Due to [19], 2-torus B is tamely embedded in M 3 if and only if there is a topological embedding…”
In this paper we consider a class of structurally stable diffeomorphisms with two-dimensional basic sets given on a closed 3-manifold. We prove that each such diffeomorphism is a locally direct product of a hyperbolic automorphism of the 2-torus and a rough diffeomorphism of the circle. We find algebraic criteria for topological conjugacy of the systems.
“…It follows from [11] and [18] that any manifold M 3 which admits structurally stable diffeomorphism → f M M : 3 3 with a two-dimensional expanding attractor (contracting repeller), is diffeomorphic to the torus T 3 and, moreover, f is topologically conjugated with the diffeomorphism obtained from the Anosov diffeomorphism by the generalized surgery operation. According to [9] each connected component of the two-dimensional surface basic set for A-diffeomorphism → f M M : 3 3 is homeomorphic to the torus and a restriction of some degree of f to this component is topologically conjugate with the Anosov diffeomorphism.…”
Section: Introduction and Formulation Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A contracting repeller of a diffeomorphism f is an expanding attractor of f −1 . According to [7], a basic set B of a diffeomorphism…”
Section: A Basic Set B Of F Is An Attractor (Repeller) If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface B M 2 is called the support of B. The following statement on surface basic sets follows from [9]. 3 3 the following holds:…”
Section: A Basic Set B Of F Is An Attractor (Repeller) If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B has type (2, 1) ((1, 2)) and, therefore, is not an expanding attractor (an contracting repeller). B coincides with its support and is a finite union of manifolds tamely embedded 6 in M 3 and homeomorphic to the 2-torus 7 . the restriction of B f k to any connected component of the support is conjugated to some hyperbolic automorphism of the torus.…”
Section: Statement 2 For Any Two-dimensional Surface Attractor (Repementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise the embedding λ is said to be wild and the manifold X is said to be wildly embedded. 7 It should be emphasized that the support of a two-dimensional surface basic set is not necessarily smooth (the corresponding example is given in [15]). Due to [19], 2-torus B is tamely embedded in M 3 if and only if there is a topological embedding…”
In this paper we consider a class of structurally stable diffeomorphisms with two-dimensional basic sets given on a closed 3-manifold. We prove that each such diffeomorphism is a locally direct product of a hyperbolic automorphism of the 2-torus and a rough diffeomorphism of the circle. We find algebraic criteria for topological conjugacy of the systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.