2003
DOI: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc1401_01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Sustainability of Project Innovations as Systemic Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
117
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
117
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two additional measurement trends are the use of office discipline referrals as an index of school-wide social culture (Irvin et (Adelman & Taylor, 2003;Mclntosh, Horner & Sugai, 2009). To date, the majority of studies examining sustained effects have been descriptive in design and documented that SWPBS was sustainable with continued levels of office discipline referral reduction (Barrett, Bradshaw, & Lewis-Palmer, 2008;Taylor-Green et al, 1997).…”
Section: The Research Employs Valid and Reliable Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two additional measurement trends are the use of office discipline referrals as an index of school-wide social culture (Irvin et (Adelman & Taylor, 2003;Mclntosh, Horner & Sugai, 2009). To date, the majority of studies examining sustained effects have been descriptive in design and documented that SWPBS was sustainable with continued levels of office discipline referral reduction (Barrett, Bradshaw, & Lewis-Palmer, 2008;Taylor-Green et al, 1997).…”
Section: The Research Employs Valid and Reliable Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a large discrepancy and the researchers interpret this as indication that there was already a stronger sense of collaboration before implementation began. The presence of a strong sense of community and collaboration aid in the sustainability of a program (Adelman & Taylor, 2003). This outcome reinforces the importance of bringing a school-wide implementation to a healthy campus where collaboration is already fostered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The fourth factor surrounds implementation time or how long the program has been active. Sufficient implementation time may be required to allow the program time to embed (Adelman & Taylor, 2003;Dusenbury & Hansen, 2004). Thus, positive effects may not immediately be apparent in the first cohorts of children.…”
Section: Research On the Effectiveness Of Social And Emotional Learnimentioning
confidence: 99%