2023
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2023)140
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On symbology and differential equations of Feynman integrals from Schubert analysis

Song He,
Xuhang Jiang,
Jiahao Liu
et al.

Abstract: We take the first step in generalizing the so-called “Schubert analysis”, originally proposed in twistor space for four-dimensional kinematics, to the study of symbol letters and more detailed information on canonical differential equations for Feynman integral families in general dimensions with general masses. The basic idea is to work in embedding space and compute possible cross-ratios built from (Lorentz products of) maximal cut solutions for all integrals in the family. We demonstrate the power of the me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a partial analysis for the kite integral was initiated in section 5, investigating whether Z-arguments can, in some way, be derived more directly from Landau analysis is an exciting avenue for future research. This is particularly relevant for the Symbol Prime bootstrap [43,[49][50][51][52]. Since it is possible to extract the symbol of the physical non ε-form kite integral I 1,1,1,1,1 from the boundary condition and differential equation provided in this work (the gauge transformation to ε-form must be undone), it would be interesting to compare our symbol with the result from a bootstrap.…”
Section: Jhep05(2024)239mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although a partial analysis for the kite integral was initiated in section 5, investigating whether Z-arguments can, in some way, be derived more directly from Landau analysis is an exciting avenue for future research. This is particularly relevant for the Symbol Prime bootstrap [43,[49][50][51][52]. Since it is possible to extract the symbol of the physical non ε-form kite integral I 1,1,1,1,1 from the boundary condition and differential equation provided in this work (the gauge transformation to ε-form must be undone), it would be interesting to compare our symbol with the result from a bootstrap.…”
Section: Jhep05(2024)239mentioning
confidence: 97%