2012
DOI: 10.1109/tcad.2012.2187524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Synthesis of Boolean Expressions for Memristive Devices Using Sequential Implication Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…higher percentage of don't cares corresponds to relatively better results. With the optimization of selecting the essential prime implicants during intermediate steps, this method is better than the method from [14,15,22]. Lehtonen method does not provide benchmark data, so actual side by side comparisons are not done, and can be done in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…higher percentage of don't cares corresponds to relatively better results. With the optimization of selecting the essential prime implicants during intermediate steps, this method is better than the method from [14,15,22]. Lehtonen method does not provide benchmark data, so actual side by side comparisons are not done, and can be done in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information on memristors, IMPLY gates and generation of timing pulses can be found in [2,3,11,22].…”
Section: Imply Sequence Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considered memristive stateful logic operations were selected in the implementation of the MLA as they require simpler CMOS control circuitry than other possible stateful logic operations, namely logical AND and logical OR [8]. Various different ways of synthesizing a given Boolean function using unconditional write operations and the material implication and converse nonimplication operations have been presented for example in [21]. It should be noted that stateful logic differs from conventional logic computation in several ways.…”
Section: A the Memristive Logic Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time needed for computation (valuation) of y depends on the length of corresponding RBF. The same authors in their follow-up paper [12] gave heuristic algorithm for RBFs minimization, which is in Depth-First Search (DFS for short) manner. Beside DFS property, minimization algorithm from [12] is polynomial, sub-optimal greedy heuristic, working only on a subset of all positive product term orders, which still represent BF of interest.…”
Section: Recursive Boolean Formula For Implication Logic a Relatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our paper, we give a generalization of theoretical concept behind minimization procedures described in [12], by introducing regular positive product term orders in RBFs, and establishing necessary and sufficient conditions for representation of the same BF after positive product terms have been reordered accordingly. As a corollary, we developed novel algorithms for minimization of RBFs, based on Breadth-First Search (BFS) traversal.…”
Section: B Regularly Ordered Recursive Boolean Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%