1989
DOI: 10.2307/2532048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Testing Departure from the Binomial and Multinomial Assumptions

Abstract: This paper is concerned with testing the multinomial (binomial) assumption against the Dirichlet-multinomial (beta-binomial) alternatives. In particular, we discuss the distribution of the asymptotic likelihood ratio (LR) test and obtain the C(alpha) goodness-of-fit test statistic. The inadequacy of the regular chi-square approximation to the LR test is supported by some Monte Carlo experiments. The C(alpha) test is recommended based on empirical significance level and power and also computational simplicity. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we tested whether the overall frequencies of hemorrhages within the four lobes were significantly different from the relative volumes of the four lobes. 15 A test for goodness of fit of the multinomial distribution against Dirichlet-multinomial alternatives 16 was used to determine whether the locations of hemorrhages within individuals were independent of one another (ie, no clustering of locations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we tested whether the overall frequencies of hemorrhages within the four lobes were significantly different from the relative volumes of the four lobes. 15 A test for goodness of fit of the multinomial distribution against Dirichlet-multinomial alternatives 16 was used to determine whether the locations of hemorrhages within individuals were independent of one another (ie, no clustering of locations).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In similar hypothesis testing situations (see, for example, Barnwal and Paul 1988;Paul et al, 1989;Breslow, 1991;Paul and Banerjee, 1998) a score test (Rao, 1947) or a more general C(α) test (Neyman, 1959) perform well in terms of level and power. Also, they require only estimates of the parameters under the null hypothesis and often produce a statistic that is simple to use.…”
Section: Shortcomings Of the Traditional Large Sample Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in similar contexts it was found earlier that both the Wald test and the likelihood ratio test suffer from the disadvantage that they often do not maintain level. See, for example, Paul et al (1989), Thall (1992), and Paul and Barnejee (1998). Here, we show such a disadvantage of the likelihood ratio statistic for testing H 0 : ρ = 0 against H A : ρ > 0 in a single clump finite mixture model.…”
Section: Shortcomings Of the Traditional Large Sample Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, locally most powerful score tests can be used for testing against the null hypothesis. 16 The above discussion concerns results as the tracking/correlation decreases. Conversely, as the a, approach 0,8 approaches co , and p approaches 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%