2009
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2009.2016821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Testing the Electronic Revenue Energy Meters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies lead us to the conclusion that testing energy meters supplying their voltage and current input channels with formerly unknown signals (RH tests), characterized by a number of randomly generated spectral components is not effective, which is in contrast to conclusions drawn by the authors in 13 . Consequently, the authors of this paper suggest performing a test containing 24 points.…”
Section: Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These studies lead us to the conclusion that testing energy meters supplying their voltage and current input channels with formerly unknown signals (RH tests), characterized by a number of randomly generated spectral components is not effective, which is in contrast to conclusions drawn by the authors in 13 . Consequently, the authors of this paper suggest performing a test containing 24 points.…”
Section: Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Adaptation of this condition (3) allows one to obtain standard uncertainty of type A -uA<0.02%. Many authors 13 do not apply standard uncertainty of type A at uncertainty evaluation of energy meters test results -this leads to unreasonable measurement time increase or to test results not meeting the required quality. …”
Section: Experimental Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accuracy-related issues, when Static meters are exposed to distorted waveform conditions have been reported in literature during the last years [1], [8], [9]. The results of distorted load sets tests in [1] shows that static meters could have accuracy errors from -6.6% to 6.5%, compared with the measures of a calibrated energy system analyser.…”
Section: B Static Electricity Metermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In [6] and [7], analogue meters under non-sinusoidal condition tend to register less energy consumption (negative error), but such error seems to be negligible and favourable to the consumer [9].…”
Section: A Electromechanical Electricity Metermentioning
confidence: 99%