2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad5e5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the 2018 Outburst of the Accreting Millisecond X-Ray Pulsar Swift J1756.9–2508 As Seen with NICER

Abstract: We report on the coherent timing analysis of the 182 Hz accreting millisecond X-ray pulsar SwiftJ1756.9−2508 during its 2018 outburst as observed with the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER). Combining our NICER observations with Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer observations of the 2007 and 2009 outbursts, we also studied the long-term spin and orbital evolution of this source. We find that the binary system is well described by a constant orbital period model, with an upper limit on the orbital per… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(50 reference statements)
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this approach we kept the orbital period, P orb , projected semi major axis, a x sin i, fixed at the optimum values given by Patruno et al ( 2010) (see their Table 4). We verified that using updated orbital ephemeris information (Bult et al 2018a) had no impact on the T asc values derived here. The best fit values for ν and T asc along with the validity interval and epoch t 0 for both outbursts separately are listed in Table 3, and are used later in this work in estimating the orbital period derivative combining information from all registered outbursts (see Sect.…”
Section: Nicer Timing Analysis Of the 2018 And 2019 Outburstssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this approach we kept the orbital period, P orb , projected semi major axis, a x sin i, fixed at the optimum values given by Patruno et al ( 2010) (see their Table 4). We verified that using updated orbital ephemeris information (Bult et al 2018a) had no impact on the T asc values derived here. The best fit values for ν and T asc along with the validity interval and epoch t 0 for both outbursts separately are listed in Table 3, and are used later in this work in estimating the orbital period derivative combining information from all registered outbursts (see Sect.…”
Section: Nicer Timing Analysis Of the 2018 And 2019 Outburstssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…During the first three recurrent outbursts from 2007 to 2018, the orbital period variation has not been detected (Krimm et al 2007b;Patruno et al 2010;Bult et al 2018a;Sanna et al 2018c). Moreover, the upper limit on the orbital period derivative is | Ṗorb | < 7.4 × 10 −13 s s −1 from the total 11 years span of the observations, consistent with the prediction of a conservative mass transfer in the binary system (Bult et al 2018a). Swift J1756.9−2508 showed long term spin-down behavior with a spin frequency derivative of |ν| 3 × 10 −13 Hz s −1 measured by Patruno et al (2010), |ν| ∼ 7.3 × 10 −16 Hz s −1 by Bult et al (2018a) and a smaller value |ν| ∼ 4.8 × 10 −16 Hz s −1 by Sanna et al (2018c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations