2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the absence of nova shells

Abstract: We present our wide field Hα+N[II] observations of 15 cataclysmic variables to search for remnant nova shells. Such shells have been found around other cataclysmic variables that were hitherto not known as novae. Our candidates were selected as objects in the period regime of high-mass transfer systems that experience -at least occasionally -low mass transfer rates. The fact that we find no indication of a nova shell in any of these systems allows us to set a lower limit of 13000 years to the recurrence time o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Including our detection limit, the percentage of novae that show shells and the number of observed systems we estimated a lower limit of 13000 years for the recurrence time of these systems. This is well in agreement to what is expected for such CVs with an average mass-transfer rate of about 5 × 10 −10 M /yr: The white dwarf needs to accrete for at least 20000 years to reach the critical mass for the nova explosion [14]. We also observed 20 novalike stars down to a limit of 10 −17 erg cm −2 s −1 arcsec −2 but without detection [15].…”
Section: The Search For Ancient Novaesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Including our detection limit, the percentage of novae that show shells and the number of observed systems we estimated a lower limit of 13000 years for the recurrence time of these systems. This is well in agreement to what is expected for such CVs with an average mass-transfer rate of about 5 × 10 −10 M /yr: The white dwarf needs to accrete for at least 20000 years to reach the critical mass for the nova explosion [14]. We also observed 20 novalike stars down to a limit of 10 −17 erg cm −2 s −1 arcsec −2 but without detection [15].…”
Section: The Search For Ancient Novaesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The success rate of these searches were 8/17, 4/17 and 13/30 nova shells found around potential candidates, these comprise roughly half of the known nova shells, the other half, for the most part, have been uncovered individually. More recently Schmidtobreick et al (2015) searched for nova shells around nova-like cataclysmic variable systems, without the successful detection of shells around the 15 objects in their study. The non-detection of nova shells around these objects are used to place constraints on the recurrence timescale of the objects Table 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, a variety of authors have failed at identifying nova shells around CVs (e.g. Schmidtobreick et al [13] or Pagnotta & Zurek [10]). This may be due either to the absence of a nova shell around these objects or to the faintness of the shell.…”
Section: Searching For Old Novaementioning
confidence: 99%