2021
DOI: 10.1090/proc/15320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the absence of remainders in the Wiener-Ikehara and Ingham-Karamata theorems: A constructive approach

Abstract: We construct explicit counterexamples that show that it is impossible to get any remainder, other than the classical ones, in the Wiener-Ikehara theorem and the Ingham-Karamata theorem under just an additional analytic continuation hypothesis to a half-plane (or even to the whole complex plane).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe, however, that Theorem 3.1 is best possible in the sense that one cannot expect any rate of decay for f if no further assumptions are imposed on the growth of ffalse^, even if ffalse^ extends to an entire function; see e.g. [69,74,75]. In order to obtain quantitative results, one assumes that ffalse^ extends analytically beyond iR to some precise domain and that this analytic extension satisfies an appropriate bound in this domain.…”
Section: Quantified Tauberian Theorems and Semi-uniform Stability Of Operator Semigroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe, however, that Theorem 3.1 is best possible in the sense that one cannot expect any rate of decay for f if no further assumptions are imposed on the growth of ffalse^, even if ffalse^ extends to an entire function; see e.g. [69,74,75]. In order to obtain quantitative results, one assumes that ffalse^ extends analytically beyond iR to some precise domain and that this analytic extension satisfies an appropriate bound in this domain.…”
Section: Quantified Tauberian Theorems and Semi-uniform Stability Of Operator Semigroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe, however, that Theorem 3.1 is best possible in the sense that one cannot expect any rate of decay for f if no further assumptions are imposed on the growth of f , even if f extends to an entire function; see e.g. [33,54,55]. In order to obtain quantitative results one assumes that f extends analytically beyond iR to some precise domain and that this analytic extension satisfies an appropriate bound in this domain.…”
Section: Quantified Tauberian Theorems and Semi-uniform Stability Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%