2016
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the accuracy and precision of cardiac magnetic resonance T2 mapping: A high‐resolution radial study using adiabatic T2 preparation at 3 T

Abstract: This evaluation of the accuracy and precision of cardiac T mapping characterizes the major vulnerabilities of the technique and will help guide protocol definition of studies that include T mapping. Magn Reson Med 77:159-169, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Retrospective analysis of the 4 discarded maps showed that the main cause of insufficient image quality was most likely insufficient communication with the performing technologist, because in 3 of the 4 patients, only routine shimming was performed, whereas cardiac shimming is essential for balanced steady-state free precession–based cardiac pulse sequences at 3 T. 14 This resulted in several dark-band artifacts (banded signal voids) through the heart, which in turn caused the self- navigation to perform suboptimally. In addition, in 2 of the 4 patients, the timing was most likely not set to the correct phase of the heart, resulting in too noisy and blurred data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrospective analysis of the 4 discarded maps showed that the main cause of insufficient image quality was most likely insufficient communication with the performing technologist, because in 3 of the 4 patients, only routine shimming was performed, whereas cardiac shimming is essential for balanced steady-state free precession–based cardiac pulse sequences at 3 T. 14 This resulted in several dark-band artifacts (banded signal voids) through the heart, which in turn caused the self- navigation to perform suboptimally. In addition, in 2 of the 4 patients, the timing was most likely not set to the correct phase of the heart, resulting in too noisy and blurred data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimized LIBRE‐Iso3DGRE protocol was then used to acquire the four input images (TE T2prep = 0–23–38–53 msec) that are needed in order to calculate a T 2 map. TE T2prep = 23 msec was the minimum possible duration of the T 2 preparation module, which was incremented in steps of 15 msec to cover the physiological range of cartilage T 2 values and to maximize T 2 fitting precision . The empirical fit offset was chosen to minimize the intercept value in the linear regression between the SE and the LIBRE‐Iso3DGRE T 2 values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with a combined signal model, the accuracy of T 1 and T 2 are dependent on each other, which may make the results more susceptible to noise, imperfect modeling (e.g., neglecting the efficiency of saturation pulse) 27 and the bias caused by the T 1 relaxation or readout-induced decay after the T 2 -prep pulse. 21,29,30 Previous work, 17 in which a similar T 2 -prep was used for 3D T 2 mapping, showed that comparable T 2 values were observed when either three or four volumes were used for fitting, in both phantoms and in vivo. The inherent high SNR of 3D acquisition makes it possible to use a reduced number of T 1 -weighted volumes for T 1 estimation (e.g., 3) without sacrificing the accuracy.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance In Medicinementioning
confidence: 97%