2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1446788718000393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Accuracy of Asymptotic Approximations to the Log-Gamma and Riemann–siegel Theta functions

Abstract: We give bounds on the error in the asymptotic approximation of the log-Gamma function ln Γ(z) for complex z in the right half-plane. These improve on earlier bounds by Behnke and Sommer (1962), Spira (1971), and Hare (1997. We show that |R k+1 (z)/T k (z)| < √ πk for nonzero z in the right half-plane, where T k (z) is the k-th term in the asymptotic series, and R k+1 (z) is the error incurred in truncating the series after k terms. If k ≤ |z|, then the stronger bound |R k+1 (z)/T k (z)| < (k/|z|) 2 /(π 2 − 1) … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gamma function and the factorial function, invented in the 1700's, have been very thoroughly studied. Richard Brent's article [8] points out some facts, known to Hermite and to Gauss, that were not covered in the survey [6], which looked at about 100 references. One learns therefore that it is difficult to claim a result (formula or proof) is truly new; we are worried in particular that Gauss knew of our Binet-like formula proved here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gamma function and the factorial function, invented in the 1700's, have been very thoroughly studied. Richard Brent's article [8] points out some facts, known to Hermite and to Gauss, that were not covered in the survey [6], which looked at about 100 references. One learns therefore that it is difficult to claim a result (formula or proof) is truly new; we are worried in particular that Gauss knew of our Binet-like formula proved here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…valid as t → +∞, where B 2k denote the Bernoulli numbers. Recently, Brent [2] employed an alternative representation of ϑ(t), obtained by application of the reflection and duplication formulas for the gamma function, in the form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%