2000
DOI: 10.1109/12.862217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the adaptation of Viterbi algorithm for diagnosis of multiple bridging faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current based diagnosis methodologies consider monitoring abnormal high currents caused by fault-induced paths from power to ground. Extensive work has been also developed in this field [7]- [14]. The main advantage of these methods as compared with the logic based strategies is that fault signatures are easier to generate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current based diagnosis methodologies consider monitoring abnormal high currents caused by fault-induced paths from power to ground. Extensive work has been also developed in this field [7]- [14]. The main advantage of these methods as compared with the logic based strategies is that fault signatures are easier to generate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These current steps, if properly interpreted, can discriminate equivalent faults under the simple I DDQ fault model. Thibeault presented [13]- [14] a method based on differential or Delta I DDQ probabilistic signatures for bridging faults. The method is performed into two steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we briefly present the original diagnosis method based on IB DDQ B probabilistic signatures [8,24,25]. Here the term signature refers to a histogram of the IB DDQ B values (difference between two consecutive IB DDQ B measurements) taken from a circuit under test.…”
Section: Diagnosis Methods Based On Differential Current Probabilisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each data source allows different bridge site reduction approaches. This results in a hybrid diagnosis method, which can be seen as a significant improvement of an existing method based on IB DDQ B probabilistic signatures [8,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Gattiker and Maly presented in [43] and [128] the amount of diagnostic information present in current signatures and how the number of current levels may distinguish bridging faults, which are equivalent under the assumption of the simple I DDQ bridging fault model. Furthermore, Thibeault proposed in [129] and [130] a method based on differential or delta I DDQ probabilistic signatures for bridging faults.…”
Section: Bridging Fault Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%