1968
DOI: 10.1007/bf02911631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the allocation of sample size in stratified sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let ;ij be the probability of inclusion of the jth unit of the ith stratum in the sample, j = 1, 2, ..., Nj; i = 1, 2, ..., k. As an estimator of the population total Y = EE Yij, consider the Horvitz-Thompson (1952) We call this the 0-optimum allocation. For this 0-optimum allocation we have a generalization of Rao's (1968) theorem the proof of which follows on the same lines as in Rao (1968) It is, however, not known from this under what conditions unstratified irPS sampling is still inferior to stratified irPS sampling when one deviates from the 0-optimum allocation. With this aim, Ramachandran and Rao (1974a) investigated whether stratified nPS sampling with various non-optimal allocations is likely to be worthwhile and whether it should at all be attempted in practice.…”
Section: Stratified Nrps and Pps Samplingmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let ;ij be the probability of inclusion of the jth unit of the ith stratum in the sample, j = 1, 2, ..., Nj; i = 1, 2, ..., k. As an estimator of the population total Y = EE Yij, consider the Horvitz-Thompson (1952) We call this the 0-optimum allocation. For this 0-optimum allocation we have a generalization of Rao's (1968) theorem the proof of which follows on the same lines as in Rao (1968) It is, however, not known from this under what conditions unstratified irPS sampling is still inferior to stratified irPS sampling when one deviates from the 0-optimum allocation. With this aim, Ramachandran and Rao (1974a) investigated whether stratified nPS sampling with various non-optimal allocations is likely to be worthwhile and whether it should at all be attempted in practice.…”
Section: Stratified Nrps and Pps Samplingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Note that for g = 2, b6 (g) = 0 and the allocation reduces to allocation proportional to X,. Elsewhere, the condition for the general case has been interpreted as the squares of the "corrected coefficients of variation" being equal in all strata and the results have been illustrated (Rao, 1968).…”
Section: J Jmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[14], we have that the do optimum n, will be proportional to N,m if 32, X,}N~ -~ is proportional to ~ and if this condition J is satisfied, we have that ni,~opt= nN~ai/E N~ai , and the expected variance corresponding to this J~ optimum allocation is given by…”
Section: N!) Among These S's Let S* Be the One Which Minimizes Lmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The justification for the assumption that the unknown proportionate values of S~'s are usually not quite different from the proportionate values of the known ~'s was examined in the light of an a priori distribution by Hanurav [10], which was further studied by Rao, T. J. [14] and Vijayan, K. [17] among others, and it is pursued further in this paper.…”
Section: ~:I J=lmentioning
confidence: 99%