1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf03323286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the ampleness of invertible sheaves in complete projective toric varieties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Haase, Nill, Pfaffenholz and Santos [18] were able to prove this for arbitrary toric surfaces. Moreover it is well known [10,26,3] that for an ample line bundle L on a possibly singular toric variety of dimension n, the multiplication map…”
Section: Vector Bundle Whose Behavior Is Closely Related To the Geomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Haase, Nill, Pfaffenholz and Santos [18] were able to prove this for arbitrary toric surfaces. Moreover it is well known [10,26,3] that for an ample line bundle L on a possibly singular toric variety of dimension n, the multiplication map…”
Section: Vector Bundle Whose Behavior Is Closely Related To the Geomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.3 is essentially equivalent to the results of Ewald and Wessels [13] and Liu, Trotter, and Ziegler [21] which, however, have been derived by different methods. 3.3 is essentially equivalent to the results of Ewald and Wessels [13] and Liu, Trotter, and Ziegler [21] which, however, have been derived by different methods.…”
Section: 4 Lei P Be a Lattice N-polytope Then The Normalization Ofmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…So it makes sense to apply the technique in this setting. In [4], Ewald and Wessels prove that if D is an ample divisor on a toric variety of dimension n, then (n − 1)D is very ample and satisfies N 0 . Bruns, Gubeladze and Trung [2] give another proof and also show that nD satisfies property N 1 .…”
Section: Green's Theorem and Hyperplane Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So at first glance the bound above seems useless. However, when n = 2 the term n(n − 2)vol(P ) vanishes, and by [4] the divisor associated to a lattice polygon P satisfies N 0 . So we obtain:…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%