Natural Phonology
DOI: 10.1515/9783110908992.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the analysis of geminates in Standard Italian and Italian dialects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike in experiment 1, both conditions contain words whose first syllable is closed (i.e., has a consonant after the vowel) and which do not differ in terms of number of timing units (Gili Fivela and Zmarich, 2005, for experimental evidence; Loporcaro, 1990). This result strongly suggests that the gemination effect is not solely reducible to difference in syllable structure between singleton and geminate words (open vs closed syllable) but represents a genuine effect of gemination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike in experiment 1, both conditions contain words whose first syllable is closed (i.e., has a consonant after the vowel) and which do not differ in terms of number of timing units (Gili Fivela and Zmarich, 2005, for experimental evidence; Loporcaro, 1990). This result strongly suggests that the gemination effect is not solely reducible to difference in syllable structure between singleton and geminate words (open vs closed syllable) but represents a genuine effect of gemination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Gili Fivela and Zmarich, 2005). In other words, it is typically assumed that the [l] in palla closes the first syllable and starts the second syllable (Loporcaro, 1990), while the [l] in pala constitutes only the onset of the second syllable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vowel duration differences are not contrastive but contextually conditioned and depend on stress and syllabic structure (D'Imperio & Rosenthall, 1999). For instance, Italian vowels are lengthened in open stressed penultimate syllables, so that the first /a/ is produced as longer in tana (/ˈtana/, 'den') than in tanta (/ˈtanta/, much-F.SG, 'much'; Farnetani & Kori, 1986;Loporcaro, 1996). Double vowel letters in Italian occur as a consequence of morphological concatenation, for instance if the second person singular present marker <-i> /i/ is added to a morpheme ending in <i> /i/, as in scii, /'ʃii/, ski-PRS.2.SG, '[you] ski'.…”
Section: Vowel Length and Its Orthographic Representation In English mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saltarelli 1984). We further assume that geminates are parsed as heterosyllabic (see Saltarelli 1983;Loporcaro 1990).…”
Section: Italian Phonology In Briefmentioning
confidence: 99%