IEEE 5th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/spawc.2004.1439281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the analysis of the MAP equalizer performance within an iterative receiver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [5], we showed that this bound is tight. When the channel is not perfectly estimated, the probability of the error event can be rewritten as…”
Section: Proof-part1: P (E M )mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [5], we showed that this bound is tight. When the channel is not perfectly estimated, the probability of the error event can be rewritten as…”
Section: Proof-part1: P (E M )mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In [5], we assumed that the channel is perfectly estimated by the receiver and we showed that the use of the a priori information by the MAP equalizer is equivalent to a gain in SNR. In this paper, we consider a more realistic scheme where the channel estimation is not perfect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we consider the case where the equalizer has a priori information on the data, provided by another module in the receiver, for instance the decoder in a turbo-equalizer [3]. In [4], we analyzed the impact of the a priori information on the MAP equalizer performance. Since the results presented in [4] hold only for unreliable a priori, we propose here to extend the analysis to the case of reliable a priori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], we analyzed the impact of the a priori information on the MAP equalizer performance. Since the results presented in [4] hold only for unreliable a priori, we propose here to extend the analysis to the case of reliable a priori. The study in [4] has been performed considering the a posteriori probabilities at the output of the equalizer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation