The llama and guanaco stomach consisted of three compartments. A transverse pillar divided the large, first compartment into cranial and caudal sacs. Both sacs contained recessed glandular saccules. The saccules in the caudal sac were everted during the gastric contraction cycle. The non-recessed surfaces of this compartment were covered by stratified squamous epithelium.The first compartment communicated on the right with a smaller, reniform second compartment. Except on the lesser curvature, this compartment contained deep cells which were lined by a papillated glandular mucosa.The ventricular groove, defined by a single muscular lip, coursed along the cranial sac of the first compartment, over the lesser curvature of the second compartment, and terminated at the tubular passage to the third compartment.The initial four-fifths of the elongate third compartment contained mucigenous glands like those found in the saccules and cells of the first and second compartment. Proper gastric glands and pyloric glands were confined to the terminal one-fifth of the third compartment.Attempts to homologize the compartments of the camelid stomach with those of the Pecora or so-called advanced ruminants were unsuccessful. The results of this study and concurrent physiologic investigations indicated that the processes of ruminant digestion can operate within wide anatomic boundaries, and that the camelid stomach with its extensive glandular mucosa is adapted for greater digestive efficiency than the advanced ruminant stomach.The new-world camelids, the llama, alpaca, guanaco, and vicuna are part of the livestock economy of South America. These animals live in a n extensive Andean zone, often at 14 to 18,000 feet above sea level. Here, the pastures consist of fibrous and woody grasses. The camelids effectively utilize this poor quality roughage at altitudes where cattle and sheep cannot graze.The camelids, like our domestic ruminants, have a capacious, compartmentalized stomach and they are ruminating animals. Structurally, however, the camelid stomach differs from that of our domestic ruminants. Attempts to homologize the compartments of the camelid stomach with those of the other ruminants have lead to considerable controversy. This controversy has contributed to the larger problem of the proper taxonomic status of the Tylopoda, i.e. the new and old-world camelids, relative to the Pecora or the so-called ad-J. MORPH., 234: 399-424.vanced (Romer, '68) or true ruminants (Walker, '64).Perrault (1666-1699) originally described four compartments in the stomach of the camel and dromedary, and noted that the mucosa in these compartments differed from that observed in other ruminating animals. In the first and largest compartment (A, figs. 1-3), he described two areas of sacculations, each of which formed a series of swellings on the serosal surface.The smaller second compartment (B, figs.
2, 3), h e noted, contained numerous deep pouches. Perrault suggested that these pouches constituted the water reservoirs previously mentio...