On the application of a new thermal diagnostic model: the passive elements equivalent in term of ventilation inside a room

Khattabi, El Mehdi El; Mharzi, Mohamed; Raefat, Saad; Meghari, Zouhair

doi:10.1088/1757-899x/353/1/012003

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other studies have focused on the simulation results of the passive house concept in Mediterranean country climates [36] and building envelope parameters managed by building automation control systems [37] in relation to thermal comfort and energy performance. With the high impact of global warming on buildings, there are insufficient studies on the effects of ABDPs on thermal comfort and energy consumption in educational buildings [38,39].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Architectural Building Design Parameters on Thermal Comfort and Energy Consumption in Higher Education Buildings

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It has been challenging for designers to identify the appropriate design parameters that would reduce building energy consumption while achieving thermal comfort for building occupants. This study aims to determine the most important architectural building design parameters (ABDPs) that can increase thermal comfort and reduce energy use in educational buildings. The effect of 15 ABDPs in an Australian educational lecture theatre and their variabilities on energy consumption and students’ thermal comfort for each parameter were analysed using Monte Carlo (MC) techniques. Two thousand simulations for every input parameter were performed based on the selected distribution using the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) technique. Sensitivity analyses (SA) and uncertainty analyses (UA) were used to assess the most important ABDPs in terms of thermal discomfort hours and energy consumption. The study found that the ABDPs, such as cooling set-point temperatures and roof construction, significantly reduce the operative temperature by up to 14.2% and 20.0%, respectively. Consequently, these reductions could significantly shorten the thermal discomfort hours, thereby reducing energy consumption by 43.7% and 41.0%, respectively. The findings of this study enable building designers to identify which ABDPs have a substantial impact on thermal comfort and energy consumption.

show abstract