2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the application of computational fluid dynamics codes for liquefied natural gas dispersion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the temperature change across the leak hole has no effects on calculation results. However, studies show that great temperature drop happens across the leak hole, and the outlet temperature is essential to predict the formation of the liquid pool outside of the hole [37]. In this paper, we predict the change in temperature by use of an isentropic expansion model and simultaneously solve the temperature with the pressure and leakage flow rate.…”
Section: Leakage Process Of the Ngl Tankmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the temperature change across the leak hole has no effects on calculation results. However, studies show that great temperature drop happens across the leak hole, and the outlet temperature is essential to predict the formation of the liquid pool outside of the hole [37]. In this paper, we predict the change in temperature by use of an isentropic expansion model and simultaneously solve the temperature with the pressure and leakage flow rate.…”
Section: Leakage Process Of the Ngl Tankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance between the actual (n k+1 ) and calculated (n k+1 cal ) number of NGL moles in the tank is used to modify the P k+1 in , given by Equation (37). It is shown that P k+1 in increases if n k+1 cal < n k+1 and conversely, P k+1 in decreases if n k+1 cal > n k+1 .…”
Section: The Tank Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A classification of heavy gas dispersion models proposed was in the first article of this review [1], it can be treated as the extension of the classification proposed by the MEG (Major Evaluation Group) [2,3]. It takes also from other reviews [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Four main groups of models are given the following names: simple/empirical models, intermediate/integral and shallow layer models, advanced/Lagrangian particle trajectory and Lagrangian puff models, sophisticated/CFD (Computer Fluid Dynamics) models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFD simulations of pollutant dispersions in the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) have been carried out in the past using the k-ε turbulence model with encouraging results both for neutrally buoyant pollutants [7] and for heavy gas dispersion processes [8][9][10]. Koopman and Ermak [11] reported a comprehensive review of the methodologies available to describe the dispersion of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the ABL and stated that "Navier-Stokes models provide the most complete description of the flow and dispersion of cold, denser than air cloud in the atmosphere and are well suited for ... dispersion simulations over complex terrain".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%