2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/wowmom.2013.6583392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the application of pipelining in aggregation convergecast scheduling

Abstract: We consider the problem of scheduling wireless transmissions in a sensor network to perform aggregation convergecast. In contrast to studies that attempt to shorten the schedule for completing a single data collection cycle, we aim to increase the frequency at which updates are collected (higher throughput). To achieve higher throughput, we use a form of pipelined concurrent collection of multiple data snapshots through the network. To attain high performance pipelining, we "expand" the time in which precedenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the first aspect, most works explicitly force parent nodes to only transmit after they have received the transmission from all their designated children [9], while other works use the same restriction implicitly [12,13]. On the second aspect, to the best of our knowledge, with the exception of our earlier work [1], no previous algorithms decide first about the node's transmission time/schedule and later about the aggregation tree. On the third aspect, we did not locate in the literature a solution proposing pipelining, except in [10], even though their use of pipelining first commits to an aggregation tree and subsequently creates a pipelined schedule over this tree.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to the first aspect, most works explicitly force parent nodes to only transmit after they have received the transmission from all their designated children [9], while other works use the same restriction implicitly [12,13]. On the second aspect, to the best of our knowledge, with the exception of our earlier work [1], no previous algorithms decide first about the node's transmission time/schedule and later about the aggregation tree. On the third aspect, we did not locate in the literature a solution proposing pipelining, except in [10], even though their use of pipelining first commits to an aggregation tree and subsequently creates a pipelined schedule over this tree.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current paper is a significantly expanded version based on our earlier work [1]. Specifically, it contributes towards the following directions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%