1983
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.1983.350503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Application of the Fast Kalman Algorithm to Adaptive Deconvolution of Seismic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both deconvolutions have to fulfill the stationary and the noise-free wavelet assumptions but not the random reflectivity and the minimum phase ones (Arya and Holden, 1978). Crump (1974) designed the Kalman Filter matrixes for deconvolution, and later, Mahalanabis et al (1983) improved the storage and updating of the matrix by estimating both the smoothed forward and backward prediction residuals of the trace, turning the algorithm computationally more efficient. Despite the above, the high computational cost remains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both deconvolutions have to fulfill the stationary and the noise-free wavelet assumptions but not the random reflectivity and the minimum phase ones (Arya and Holden, 1978). Crump (1974) designed the Kalman Filter matrixes for deconvolution, and later, Mahalanabis et al (1983) improved the storage and updating of the matrix by estimating both the smoothed forward and backward prediction residuals of the trace, turning the algorithm computationally more efficient. Despite the above, the high computational cost remains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Crump (1974) first uses the discrete Kalman filter successfully for the deconvolution of the seismic signals to generate an estimate of the reflectivity function. Mahalanabis et al (1981Mahalanabis et al ( , 1983 propose fast and adaptive Kalman filter algorithms. Using the Kalman filter with different dimensions applied to seismic traces, Sayman (1992) uses optimal fixed-interval smoothing filters to attenuate the unexpected high-frequency energy caused by the original Kalman filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…?at recent interest and a number of efforts have been rt!ported which apply the modern estimation theory techniques to improve the performance over the classically used, simple predictive deconvolution techniques. Amongst some of the notable recent approaches to this problem for seismic applications are the "white-noise" B~rnoulli sequence estimationfdetection approach of Mendel and his co-workers [l-4] (see also [S]) and the adaptive predictive deconvolution approaches of Griffiths [6], Prasad and Mahalanabis [7] and their co-workers [8][9][10]. The state-variable formulation of the deconvolution problem (also called the input white-noise estimation problem) and its several solutions suggested in [I-S] are very elegant and should be very useful whenever sufficient information is available about the nature of the seismic wavelet to warrant such modelling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state-variable formulation of the deconvolution problem (also called the input white-noise estimation problem) and its several solutions suggested in [I-S] are very elegant and should be very useful whenever sufficient information is available about the nature of the seismic wavelet to warrant such modelling. The adaptive, tim~-varying op!rators either in the tapped-delay line or the !attic~ filter forms suggested in [6][7][8][9][10], on the other hand, are likely to prove effective on nonstationary seismic data as from offshore experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%