2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(00)00065-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the approximations of the tangential slip in frictional contact analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the so-called regularized formulation of frictional contact (Liu et al, 2000), the total tangential slip g T is split into a recoverable portion g EL T and an irrecoverable portion g IL T ,…”
Section: Friction Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the so-called regularized formulation of frictional contact (Liu et al, 2000), the total tangential slip g T is split into a recoverable portion g EL T and an irrecoverable portion g IL T ,…”
Section: Friction Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another existing approach is the viscous contact model whose mechanism is illustrated in Figure 1(c) [1,5,[12][13][14]. This contact model consists of a dashpot and the Coulomb element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constitutive model employed by Laursen and Oancea [15] was, however, based on viscoplasticity and the discussion was restricted to rate dependence in the slipping phase. Although rate dependence in the sticking phase can be considered in the constitutive model shown by Liu et al [14], which can be viewed as an extension of the Maxwell model with a non-linear dashpot [16], their discussion was restricted to two-dimensional problems. More importantly, if the formulations by Liu et al [14] or those by Laursen and Oancea [15] are directly applied, numerical di culties like divide zero by zero or ill-conditioning of the tangent sti ness matrix may be encountered in recovering the rate-independent elastoplastic contact model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation