2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13571-011-0022-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio test when parameters lie on the boundary

Abstract: The paper discusses statistical inference dealing with the asymptotic theory of likelihood ratio tests when some parameters may lie on boundary of the parameter space. We derive a closed form solution for the case when one parameter of interest and one nuisance parameter lie on the boundary. The asymptotic distribution is not always a mixture of several chi-square distributions. For the cases when one parameter of interest and two nuisance parameters or two parameters of interest and one nuisance parameter are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A list of sufficient regularity conditions for this result can be found, for example, in Casella and Berger (2001, p. 516). One of them is clearly not met in the present case: in the pairwise comparison of some of our models, every point of Φ0 is a boundary point of Φ. In other words, if H0 is true, the vector of true parameters φ*Φ0, whichever it might be, is on the boundary of Φ. This irregularity is present, for example, when M1=M2=0 according to H0 and M1, M2[0,) according to H1. The problem of parameters on the boundary has been the subject of articles such as Self and Liang (1987) and Kopylev and Sinha (2011). The limiting distribution of the likelihood-ratio test statistic under this irregularity has been derived in these articles, but only for very specific cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A list of sufficient regularity conditions for this result can be found, for example, in Casella and Berger (2001, p. 516). One of them is clearly not met in the present case: in the pairwise comparison of some of our models, every point of Φ0 is a boundary point of Φ. In other words, if H0 is true, the vector of true parameters φ*Φ0, whichever it might be, is on the boundary of Φ. This irregularity is present, for example, when M1=M2=0 according to H0 and M1, M2[0,) according to H1. The problem of parameters on the boundary has been the subject of articles such as Self and Liang (1987) and Kopylev and Sinha (2011). The limiting distribution of the likelihood-ratio test statistic under this irregularity has been derived in these articles, but only for very specific cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second irregularity, that is, the problem of having parameters on the boundary, has been the subject of papers such as Self and Liang (1987) and Kopylev and Sinha (2011). The limiting distribution of the likelihood ratio test statistic under this irregularity has been derived in these papers, but only for very specific cases.…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kopylev and Sinha (2011) discussed the case when the parameter of interest and a nuisance parameter lie on the boundary. Here we consider the case when two nuisance paramaters lie on the boundary and the parameter of interest is an interior point.…”
Section: Two Parameters On the Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%