1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01304449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the band structure of silver and platinum from angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy (ARUPS) measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(b). The results can be compared despite the fact that they were obtained for photon energies differing by 1 eV, since the calculation neglects a self-energy correction of about the same magnitude (0.75 eV, see Wern et al 16 ). While we find good qualitative agreement for the total intensities (a convolution of the calculated spectra with the experimental resolution of 250 meV will mainly broaden peak 1), the polarization values in peak 1 and peak 2 are in excellent agreement with the theoretical results.…”
Section: Experimental Verification Of a New Spin-polarization Effect mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1(b). The results can be compared despite the fact that they were obtained for photon energies differing by 1 eV, since the calculation neglects a self-energy correction of about the same magnitude (0.75 eV, see Wern et al 16 ). While we find good qualitative agreement for the total intensities (a convolution of the calculated spectra with the experimental resolution of 250 meV will mainly broaden peak 1), the polarization values in peak 1 and peak 2 are in excellent agreement with the theoretical results.…”
Section: Experimental Verification Of a New Spin-polarization Effect mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3 Table I. Subsequent columns of Table I list measured values from photoemission for the onset of a nearly-free-electron (NFE) band in the substrate 30,31,32,33 (as further discussed in Section III), our measured values for the work function difference  between the bare metal surface (an oxidized Cu surface in the present case) and the graphene-covered surface, measured values for the work function of the bare metal surface M  from the literature, 34,35,36,37 and the difference    M which corresponds to an experimental value for the work function of graphene on the metal surface.…”
Section: A Cu(001)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is remarkable that the peaks J and C are of comparable intensity. On the basis of intensity calculations for normal photoemission from Ag(lll) (33) and Au(lll) [34), the transition J should not be measurable due to a vanishing surface transmission factor.…”
Section: Spin-resolved Photoemission From Ir(lll)mentioning
confidence: 99%