2011
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Benefit of Intensive Care for Very Old Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, no studies have determined the prevalence of baseline cardiovascular treatment in the elderly (≥ 80 years-old) admitted to the ICU. Prevalence of ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality was in agreement with previously published literature, where results vary between 19.5%-47% [22,[24][25][26], 33%-55% [3,22,27] and 48%-67% [24,28] respectively. The medians of ICU and hospital length of stay were in the range reported in other series [6,29,30].…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To our knowledge, no studies have determined the prevalence of baseline cardiovascular treatment in the elderly (≥ 80 years-old) admitted to the ICU. Prevalence of ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality was in agreement with previously published literature, where results vary between 19.5%-47% [22,[24][25][26], 33%-55% [3,22,27] and 48%-67% [24,28] respectively. The medians of ICU and hospital length of stay were in the range reported in other series [6,29,30].…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Short-term survival may clearly benefit from ICU treatment but 1-year mortality is very high. There are indications that the incremental mortality benefit of very old patients admitted to the ICU is not substantial [4]. If other important outcomes are considered (functional outcome and quality of life) the beneficial outcome from intensive care therapy is even less certain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the large Eldicus study the elderly patients (greater than 75 years old) were found to have more ICU rejections than younger ones (less than 75 years old) despite having a greater mortality benefit [3]. On the other hand, in a prospective French study, no survival benefit was found in VOPs who were admitted versus rejected patients [4]. The imminent increase in the number of VOPs will likely increase the need for triage even further as it seems unlikely there will be a significant growth of ICU bed numbers in Europe.…”
Section: Triagementioning
confidence: 97%
“…To date, there is no randomized, controlled study available; the only available data came from observational studies with inherent limitations (retrospective collection of data at baseline, lack of a control group). Boumendil et al recently reported in a multicenter observational study (including a majority of medical admissions) that ICU admission compared with admission to a regular ward did not improve the long-term survival of patients aged 80 years and older [30]. These results emphasized previous data of Martínez-Sellés et al who reported that the outcome of persons aged 90 years and older admitted with acute myocardial infarction was not influenced by an admission to a coronary care unit [31].…”
Section: Strategies To Cope With the Burden Of Elderly Patients Who Rmentioning
confidence: 99%