2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10657-017-9569-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the benefits of being naive: the choice of contract duration with projection bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our focus here is on hunger. Several studies have tested projection bias in consumer behaviour research (Acland & Levy, 2015; Bienenstock & Ropaul, 2018; Buchheim & Kolasak, 2015). Projection bias has also been tested in the food sector and the under‐appreciation of the effects of hunger is, perhaps, the most apparent evidence of this phenomenon (see de‐Magistris & Gracia, 2016; Gilbert et al, 2002; Briz et al, 2015, for detailed analysis and discussion of testing for projection bias).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our focus here is on hunger. Several studies have tested projection bias in consumer behaviour research (Acland & Levy, 2015; Bienenstock & Ropaul, 2018; Buchheim & Kolasak, 2015). Projection bias has also been tested in the food sector and the under‐appreciation of the effects of hunger is, perhaps, the most apparent evidence of this phenomenon (see de‐Magistris & Gracia, 2016; Gilbert et al, 2002; Briz et al, 2015, for detailed analysis and discussion of testing for projection bias).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Noor (2007) underlines that self-control problems may be one reason for the low saving rate. Bienenstock and Ropaul (2018) investigate consumers with long-term contract. They compare naïve individuals whose decision results in projection bias and sophisticated consumers who accurately estimate their future willingness to pay (WTP).…”
Section: The Change Of Preferences and Tastesmentioning
confidence: 99%