2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

71
977
15
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 721 publications
(1,091 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
71
977
15
9
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a bilingual advantage may only arise when the task requires some degree of conflict resolution or switching between tasks (e.g., Costa, Hernández, Costa-Faidella, & Sebastián-Gallés, 2009;Hilchey & Klein, 2011;Prior & Macwhinney, 2009). Bilingual advantages in conflict resolution and task switching would be consistent with both the Inhibitory Control Model and the Adaptive Control Hypothesis, which BILINGUAL WORKING MEMORY 18 assume that bilinguals use these processes for language control (Green, 1998;Green & Abutalebi, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For example, a bilingual advantage may only arise when the task requires some degree of conflict resolution or switching between tasks (e.g., Costa, Hernández, Costa-Faidella, & Sebastián-Gallés, 2009;Hilchey & Klein, 2011;Prior & Macwhinney, 2009). Bilingual advantages in conflict resolution and task switching would be consistent with both the Inhibitory Control Model and the Adaptive Control Hypothesis, which BILINGUAL WORKING MEMORY 18 assume that bilinguals use these processes for language control (Green, 1998;Green & Abutalebi, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, we will examine how evidence for structural changes may contribute to this debate on the 'advantages' and 'disadvantages' of bilingualism at the behavioural level (Abutalebi & Green, 2007;Antón et al, 2014;Bialystok & Barac, 2012;Costa et al, 2009;Costa et al, 2008;Duñabeitia et al, 2014;Gathercole et al, 2014;Gollan et al, 2011;Kroll & Bialystok, 2013;Martin et al, 2012;Paap & Greenberg, 2013;. In this sense, we will highlight how neuroimaging data could contribute to the debate by adding empirical evidence from a different perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note, however, that in this article we leave aside other potential differences that may emerge as a function of the knowledge and/or use of more than a single language, given that it is not the primary focus of this review. There is much evidence demonstrating that bilinguals outperform monolinguals in executive control tasks (see Abutalebi & Green, 2007;Bialystok, Craik, & Luk, 2012 for a review; see also Bialystok & Barac, 2012;Costa, Hernández, Costa-Faidella, & Sebastián-Gallés, 2009;Costa, Hernández, & Sebastián-Gallés, 2008). At a broad level, the underlying hypothesis for the so-called 'bilingual advantage' in executive functions is that bilinguals are used to constantly dealing with different languages and to preventing mutual interference between languages by selecting the target language while inhibiting the non-target language(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is ongoing debate about whether language selection takes place via a process of inhibition (e.g. Abutalebi and Green, 2007;Green, 1998;Prior;Van Heuven et al, 2008), by the maintenance of goals and self-monitoring (Colzato et al, 2008;Costa et al, 2009) or a combination of these (Bialystok et al, 2012;Green and Abutalebi, 2013). Similarly, the neural bases of bilingual language control are not yet fully elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%