1980
DOI: 10.1016/0305-0491(80)90038-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the biochemical systematics of three apodemus species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…number in parentheses), tissues (L = liver, K = kidney, H = heart), buffer systems (P = continuous phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, TM = continuous tris-maleate buffer, pH 7.4 - Csaikl et al 1980, TC = continuous tris-citrate buffer, pH 8.0 - Manlove et ai. 1975) and references for staining procedures (1 = Thorup et al 1961, 2 = Shaw and Prasad 1970, 3 = Brewer and Sing 1970, 4 = Selander et al 1971, 5 = Siciliano and Shaw 1976, 6 = Harris and Hopkinson 1976, 7 = Qavi and Kit 1980, 8 = Richardson et al 1986 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…number in parentheses), tissues (L = liver, K = kidney, H = heart), buffer systems (P = continuous phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, TM = continuous tris-maleate buffer, pH 7.4 - Csaikl et al 1980, TC = continuous tris-citrate buffer, pH 8.0 - Manlove et ai. 1975) and references for staining procedures (1 = Thorup et al 1961, 2 = Shaw and Prasad 1970, 3 = Brewer and Sing 1970, 4 = Selander et al 1971, 5 = Siciliano and Shaw 1976, 6 = Harris and Hopkinson 1976, 7 = Qavi and Kit 1980, 8 = Richardson et al 1986 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to resolve the phylogeny, other different approaches have also been used: protein electrophoresis (Engel et al. 1973; Csaikl et al. 1980; Gébczyński et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species within the subgenus Sylvaemus are phenotypically very similar, and traditional morphometrics are often at a loss to distinguish between them Zagorodnyuk, 1996). For this reason, several authors have employed protein electrophoresis (Britton-Davidian et al, 1991;Csaikl et al, 1980;Engel et al, 1973;Filippucci, 1992;Filippucci et al, 1996Filippucci et al, , 2002Gemmeke, 1980;Hartl et al, 1992;Mezhzherin and Zykov, 1991) and traditional cytogenetics (Bulatova et al, 1991;Nadjafova et al, 1993;Zima, 1984) in an attempt to unravel relationships. Unfortunately, similar to morphometrics, cytogenetics were not successful in delimiting species, given the uniformity in karyotypic characteristics of this subgenus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%