2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3633940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the bootstrap current in stellarators and tokamaks

Abstract: The expression for the long-mean-free-path limit of the bootstrap current in stellarators is rederived in such a way that the expansion procedure is identical to that used in the corresponding calculation for a tokamak. In addition, the first correction due to finite collisionality is calculated and shown to vanish in quasi-isodynamic configurations without net current. This correction, which is proportional to the square root of the collisionality, is found to compare well with a numerical solution of the fir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bootstrap current is positive in quasi-axisymmetric stellarators, negative in quasi-helically symmetric ones, and is close to zero in quasi-isodynamic devices [29,50,51]. The latter have the additional property that the Pfirsch-Schlüter current closes within each period of the configuration [47].…”
Section: Quasisymmetric and Quasi-isodynamic Stellaratorsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The bootstrap current is positive in quasi-axisymmetric stellarators, negative in quasi-helically symmetric ones, and is close to zero in quasi-isodynamic devices [29,50,51]. The latter have the additional property that the Pfirsch-Schlüter current closes within each period of the configuration [47].…”
Section: Quasisymmetric and Quasi-isodynamic Stellaratorsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, we find that this result ceases to be valid in the √ ν or ν-regimes, where the component of the drifts tangential to the flux surface causes the appearance of an additional term that needs to be taken into account. It is well known from numerical results [Beidler et al (2011);Helander et al (2011)] that the approach to the lowcollisionality limit is slow, and in the penultimate section of the paper we identify a possible reason for this behaviour and derive a scaling for the deviation from the lowcollisionality result. Our conclusions are summarised in the final section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…3 of Kernbichler et al (2016). At least sometimes, the finitecollisionality correction appears to scale as ν 0.5 * , which is indistinguishable from ν 0.4 * , see Helander et al (2011).…”
Section: Finite Collisionalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a 3D device, a bootstrap current arises due to similar reasons as in a tokamak, but the size of it is typically substantially smaller than the Ohmic current in a tokamak [1,2,20]. The bootstrap current is a consequence of the trapped particle orbits, and is generally larger at low collisionality than at high collisionality [16,21].…”
Section: Impurity Density Peaking and Bootstrap Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%