2022
DOI: 10.1007/s41237-022-00187-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the boundary problems in diagnostic classification models

Abstract: The data analysis code is available at the open science framework website: https://osf.io/rwe5t/. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this context, it is important to note that recently there have been articles pointing out that in situations of low sample size, MMLE-EM can have boundary problems, i.e., that the parameter estimate (in this case a probability of success bounded between 0 and 1) converges toward the boundary of the parameter space [25,26]. It is for this reason that different alternatives for estimating item parameters or classifying individuals have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Estimation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this context, it is important to note that recently there have been articles pointing out that in situations of low sample size, MMLE-EM can have boundary problems, i.e., that the parameter estimate (in this case a probability of success bounded between 0 and 1) converges toward the boundary of the parameter space [25,26]. It is for this reason that different alternatives for estimating item parameters or classifying individuals have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Estimation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core idea of two-level DCMs is to combine DCMs and latent class models using relationship probabilities that connect both measurement models. Figure 1 For the diagnostic measurement, we employed the latent class formulation and notations utilized in Yamaguchi and Okada (2020a) and Yamaguchi andTemplin (2022a, 2022b).…”
Section: Elements Of Two-level Dcmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed update rules follow. Several derivations of the update rules are provided in Yamaguchi (2023).…”
Section: 𝐾 𝑙=1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sen and Cohen (2021) set the intercept at −1.1, main effect at 1.3, and interaction effects at 3, which mimicked items with medium-quality. Madison et al (2023) assumed that intercepts were fixed at 0.2, main effects at 2.5 or 1.5, and interactions at 1. Madison and Bradshaw (2018) set intercepts at −2, main effects at 2 or 3, and interaction effects 1.…”
Section: Simulation Study 1 Simulation Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%