2003
DOI: 10.4310/atmp.2003.v7.n3.a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the BRST Cohomology of Superstrings with/without Pure Spinors

Abstract: We replace our earlier condition that physical states of the superstring have non-negative grading by the requirement that they are analytic in a new real commuting constant t which we associate with the central charge of the underlying Kac-Moody superalgebra.The analogy with the twisted N=2 SYM theory suggests that our covariant superstring is a twisted version of another formulation with an equivariant cohomology. We prove that our vertex operators correspond in one-to-one fashion to the vertex operators in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BRST operator in these extended pure spinor formalisms have been related to the RNS BRST operator [10], to the light-cone GS spectrum [11], and to the original pure spinor BRST operator [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BRST operator in these extended pure spinor formalisms have been related to the RNS BRST operator [10], to the light-cone GS spectrum [11], and to the original pure spinor BRST operator [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], it was shown explicitly that the pure spinor BRST cohomology includes the states which appear at first massive level of open string as described above. The unintegrated form of the vertex operator for these states was also constructed in [1] (see also [19][20][21][22]). …”
Section: Jhep01(2018)019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of (1.8) for the unconstrained Λ α might be useful for understanding the relation with "extended" versions of the pure spinor formalism such as [20][21][22][23] in which the spinor ghosts were unconstrained. After defining Γ m and Γ m as in (1.5), the RNS γ ghost only appears in even powers so it is convenient to define a new ghost variable γ ≡ (γ) 2 .…”
Section: Jhep04(2014)024mentioning
confidence: 99%