1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1765(97)00025-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the calculation of marginal effects in the bivariate probit model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted in Greene (2003) and Christofides et al (1997), in a two-equation setting it is not always absolutely clear on what margins are the effects being calculated by the empirical analyst and/or estimation software. There exist more than one option in terms of choosing the margins at which effects could be calculated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in Greene (2003) and Christofides et al (1997), in a two-equation setting it is not always absolutely clear on what margins are the effects being calculated by the empirical analyst and/or estimation software. There exist more than one option in terms of choosing the margins at which effects could be calculated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The marginal effects in Table 4 represent the sum of the direct and indirect changes of the probability of migrating or continuing in a PhD track resulting from a unit change in the explanatory variable. The marginal effects on the migration and PhD decisions can be interpreted as (quasi-)elasticities evaluated at the means of the explanatory variables (Greene 1996;Christofides et al , 2000. The dummy variables are set to one instead of zero to calculate the marginal effects.…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on bivariate probit regression, we estimate and report the average marginal effects of covariates on the joint probabilities of different transition outcomes (see Christofides et al 1997Christofides et al , 2000Greene 2012). With regard to the two binary variables of interest to this study, there are four possible combinations of transition outcomes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%