2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl078071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Cause of Recent Variations in Lower Stratospheric Ozone

Abstract: We use height-resolved and total column satellite observations and 3-D chemical transport model simulations to study stratospheric ozone variations during 1998-2017 as ozone-depleting substances decline. In 2017 extrapolar lower stratospheric ozone displayed a strong positive anomaly following much lower values in 2016. This points to large interannual variability rather than an ongoing downward trend, as reported recently by Ball et al. (2018Ball et al. ( , https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1379Ball et al. ( -20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
138
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
15
138
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All simulations were performed for the period 2000 to 2017. The version of the stratospheric model employed here was recently used by Chipperfield et al (2018) to investigate lower stratospheric ozone trends and is used by Harrison et al (2018) to interpret long-term COCl 2 observations from ACE. It has also been extensively evaluated in terms of both chemistry and transport (e.g., Harrison et al, 2016;Wales et al, 2018).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Atmospheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All simulations were performed for the period 2000 to 2017. The version of the stratospheric model employed here was recently used by Chipperfield et al (2018) to investigate lower stratospheric ozone trends and is used by Harrison et al (2018) to interpret long-term COCl 2 observations from ACE. It has also been extensively evaluated in terms of both chemistry and transport (e.g., Harrison et al, 2016;Wales et al, 2018).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Atmospheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They estimated a mean increase of 3.7 ppt Cl/year over this period, with the positive trend reflecting increasing CH 2 Cl 2 . Although the impact of this additional chlorine on stratospheric ozone is expected to have been modest over the last decade (Chipperfield et al, ), possible future increases in Cl‐VSLS emissions could influence the time scale for stratospheric ozone recovery, particularly in polar regions (Hossaini et al, ). Such projections carry large uncertainties; however, they are important to consider to provide bounds on potential resulting ozone changes, especially given that large CH 2 Cl 2 emission increases from major economies are projected under business as usual scenarios until 2030 (Feng et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlorinated Very Short-Lived Substances (Cl-VSLS), including chloroform (CHCl 3 ) and dichloromethane (CH 2 Cl 2 ), are a significant source of stratospheric chlorine (e.g., Hossaini et al, 2015;Laube et al, 2008) and therefore contribute to ozone depletion (e.g., Chipperfield et al, 2018;Hossaini et al, 2017). These compounds have surface atmospheric lifetimes of~6 months or less (e.g., Ko et al, 2003) and are used in a variety of commercial and industrial applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to increasing emissions, tropospheric CH 2 Cl 2 mixing ratios have approximately doubled since the early 2000s, evidenced by long-term surface monitoring data (e.g., Hossaini et al, 2015Hossaini et al, , 2017 and measurements in the upper troposphere (Leedham Elvidge et al, 2015). Although the influence of CH 2 Cl 2 on ozone has been modest in the recent past (Chipperfield et al, 2018), if sustained CH 2 Cl 2 growth continues in ©2019. The Authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, despite potential recovery of upper stratosphere ozone, extrapolar lower stratosphere ozone has been declining since 1998 without an attributed cause (Ball et al, ). However, this trend has been disputed by analysis suggesting that the trend is not as significant when including the year 2017 and that ozone trends in the midlatitudes are largely due to dynamic variability (Chipperfield et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%