1878
DOI: 10.1061/taceat.0000315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Cause of the Maximum Velocity of Water Flowing in Open Channels being below the Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A characterizing feature of turbulent flows in open ducts is the so called ‘velocity dip’ phenomenon, namely the fact that, differently from laminar flows, the maximum streamwise velocity does not occur at the free surface, but below it. This phenomenon was already observed by hydraulic engineers in the 19th century (Francis 1878; Stearns 1883), and it has been reported in numerous experiments (Nezu, Nakagawa & Tominaga 1985; Kirkgöz & Ardiçlioğlu 1997; Yang, Tan & Lim 2004; Knight et al. 2018) and more recently also in numerical simulations (Sakai 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A characterizing feature of turbulent flows in open ducts is the so called ‘velocity dip’ phenomenon, namely the fact that, differently from laminar flows, the maximum streamwise velocity does not occur at the free surface, but below it. This phenomenon was already observed by hydraulic engineers in the 19th century (Francis 1878; Stearns 1883), and it has been reported in numerous experiments (Nezu, Nakagawa & Tominaga 1985; Kirkgöz & Ardiçlioğlu 1997; Yang, Tan & Lim 2004; Knight et al. 2018) and more recently also in numerical simulations (Sakai 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…For the open duct cases with (figure 7 d – f ), the presence of the free surface breaks the symmetry, making the velocity isocontours no longer closed, and shifting the maximum velocity farther from the bottom wall. In laminar open duct flows, the maximum streamwise velocity is located at the free surface, whereas in the turbulent case it dips below it, as first observed by Francis (1878) and Stearns (1883). The mean streamwise velocity in open ducts with , shows similar velocity dip as in the case (figure 7 g – i ).…”
Section: Mean Flow Structurementioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, in narrow open-channels involving an aspect ratio Ar < 5, where Ar = b/h is the ratio of the channel width b to flow depth, and near side walls or corner zones even for wide open-channels (Vanoni 1941), the maximum velocity appears below the free surface producing the velocity-dip-phenomenon, involving a deviation from the log-wake law. This phenomenon, which was reported more than a century ago (Francis 1878, Stearns 1883, was observed both in open-channels and rivers. It is related to secondary currents generated in three-dimensional (3D) open-channel flows (Imamoto andIshigaki 1988, Wang andCheng 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The shape of the cross section, the roughness of the channel walls, and the presence of bends or a small disturbance at the entrance were proposed as possible causes of unequalized shear stresses on both sides of the channel and of the maximum velocity below the surface. 36 This has also been observed in open water systems such as rivers and streams, where the maximum flow velocity often occurs at ∼ 1 / 3 depth below the water surface, 37,38 with a typical flow profile similar to that in Figure 5b.…”
Section: Langmuirmentioning
confidence: 71%