2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-011-0298-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the centralizer and the commutator subgroup of an automorphism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let α be an automorphism of a group G. Obviously, the centralizer C G (α) and the commutator subgroup [G, α] = g −1 g α ; g ∈ G are normal α-invariant subgroups of G. It is well known that the centralizer C G (α) in some sense has consequences on G, and in particular on G/[G, α]. For example, Endimioni and Moravec [3] proved that if α is an automorphism of a polycyclic group G and C G (α) is finite, then G/[G, α] is finite.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let α be an automorphism of a group G. Obviously, the centralizer C G (α) and the commutator subgroup [G, α] = g −1 g α ; g ∈ G are normal α-invariant subgroups of G. It is well known that the centralizer C G (α) in some sense has consequences on G, and in particular on G/[G, α]. For example, Endimioni and Moravec [3] proved that if α is an automorphism of a polycyclic group G and C G (α) is finite, then G/[G, α] is finite.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endimioni and Moravec in [2] prove that if φ is an automorphism of a polycyclic group G with its fixed-point set…”
Section: Mathematics Subject Classification: 20f16 20e36mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endimioni and Moravec in [2] prove that if φ is an automorphism of a polycyclic group G with its fixed-point set C G (φ) finite, then G modulo [G, φ] = g −1 · gφ : g ∈ G is also finite (so [G, φ] is large), but the converse is false, even if φ has order 2, C G (φ) = 1 and G is polycyclic and metabelian. These and related results are extended in [9] to, in particular, soluble groups of finite rank.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trivially G has Hirsch number 0. As Endimioni and Moravec point out in [1], we do need f of finite order in iii), even if G is free abelian of rank 2. Note that iii) implies that G=G; f is isomorphic to a finite extension of a section of C G (f); see Remark 6 below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%