1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02572429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the character variety of group representations in SL(2, ℂ) and PSL(2, ℂ)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
106
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 4 provides the finishing touch. We rely on a parameterization of the character set given in [8]. Most of the defining polynomials turn out to be specialized Procesi identities, while the remaining few succumb to other tools from Section 3.…”
Section: Theorem If M Contains No Non-boundary Parallel Incompressimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 4 provides the finishing touch. We rely on a parameterization of the character set given in [8]. Most of the defining polynomials turn out to be specialized Procesi identities, while the remaining few succumb to other tools from Section 3.…”
Section: Theorem If M Contains No Non-boundary Parallel Incompressimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1983, Culler and Shalen defined the character variety and showed that it is in fact an algebraic set [6]; the set is the image under a "trace" map. González-Acuña and Montesinos-Amilibia showed in 1993 that the relations of Magnus in fact determine the algebraic set that Culler and Shalen had defined [19]. In 2001, Sikora, using results of Procesi [26], showed that the character variety of SL(n, C) can be realized as spaces of graphs subject to topologically motivated relations [30].…”
Section: History Of Sl(2 C) Invariant Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see González-Acuña and Montesinos-Amilibia's paper [12]). Now, from the presentation (6) above it is clear that each representation ρ : π 1 (M, * ) → PSL 2 C lifts to exactly two representation ±ρ :…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(These points correspond to the trivial representation and to the two orientation-preserving conjugacy classes of discrete and faithful representations.) Since the line V = 2 corresponds to reducible representations (see [12]) Orth K takes the whole line to the point (1, 1). On the curve (9), Proposition 12 implies that…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%