2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00021-014-0164-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Characterization of the Navier–Stokes Flows with the Power-Like Energy Decay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It completes well known Wiegner's Theorem by giving several necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of bounds from below for the decay of the energy. It improves [2,Theorem 6.5], and completes an earlier study by Skalák [9] where only the upper bounds were discussed.…”
Section: Application To Nonlinear Dissipative Systems: the Navier-stosupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It completes well known Wiegner's Theorem by giving several necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of bounds from below for the decay of the energy. It improves [2,Theorem 6.5], and completes an earlier study by Skalák [9] where only the upper bounds were discussed.…”
Section: Application To Nonlinear Dissipative Systems: the Navier-stosupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Therefore, under the same restrictions on σ and the conditions of item (iii), it easily follows that u = e t∆ u 0 + w satisfies the estimates as in (5.1). The proof of the implication (iv) ⇒ (iii) relies on the so-called inverse Wiegner's theorem recently established by Z. Skalák [9]: his results asserts (among other things) that if u is a weak solution of the Navier-Stokes equation as above, satisfying u(t) 2 (1 + t) −σ (with 0 ≤ σ ≤ 5/4) then e t∆ u 0 2…”
Section: Application To Nonlinear Dissipative Systems: the Navier-stomentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The derivation in [11,26] is actually much simpler than Wiegner's original proof. The inverse Wiegner's theorem above was first obtained by Z. Skalák in dimension n = 3 (see [20], Theorem 3.1) using a very elaborated argument. The proof of Theorem 7.1 given here is much simpler and is based on monotonicity ideas if n = 2.…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 22mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A natural question is whether the converse property holds, that is, if the knowledge that ‖𝒖(⋅, 𝑡)‖ 𝐿 2 (ℝ 𝑛 ) = 𝑂(1 + 𝑡) −𝛼 for some 0 < 𝛼 ⩽ (𝑛 + 2)∕4 will entail that ‖𝒗(⋅, 𝑡)‖ 𝐿 2 (ℝ 𝑛 ) = 𝑂(1 + 𝑡) −𝛼 as well. A positive answer was given by Skalák's "inverse Wiegner's theorem" [15], using an elaborated argument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%