2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2009.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the closed form solutions for non-extensive Value at Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytical solutions of Eq. (2) near the reported values of q in the literature, to be used as a direct Value at Risk technique, have been recently obtained (Stavroyiannis, Makris, & Nikolaidis, 2009) for highfrequency data for the Dow Jones Industrial Average index. We have included in the analysis all possible extreme values and pdf asymmetries, however it should be noted that extending a typical box plot to the 0.005 percentile except a few "outliers" (Johansen & Sornette, 1998) 99.99% of the data form a symmetric structure, with the most obvious example the positive extreme point (∼13.57 standard deviations) of the daily historical difference at 10-11 December 1987.…”
Section: Non-extensive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Analytical solutions of Eq. (2) near the reported values of q in the literature, to be used as a direct Value at Risk technique, have been recently obtained (Stavroyiannis, Makris, & Nikolaidis, 2009) for highfrequency data for the Dow Jones Industrial Average index. We have included in the analysis all possible extreme values and pdf asymmetries, however it should be noted that extending a typical box plot to the 0.005 percentile except a few "outliers" (Johansen & Sornette, 1998) 99.99% of the data form a symmetric structure, with the most obvious example the positive extreme point (∼13.57 standard deviations) of the daily historical difference at 10-11 December 1987.…”
Section: Non-extensive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 62%