1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00121-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the combination of ECP-based CI calculations with all-electron spin-orbit mean-field integrals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the radial components of the SOC operator (12) are chosen to be analytical functions of the form whose parameters \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\{B^{n \ell, I}_{k}, \beta_{ k}^{n \ell, I}\}$\end{document} are determined through least‐squares fitting to the radial parts of the numerical Wood–Boring spin‐orbit operator of an atom I 73. The SOMF Hamiltonian has been used, too, in combination with effective core potentials 74,75. In this case, one has to make sure that a close correspondence exists between the valence orbitals of the all‐electron and the effective core potential calculations.…”
Section: Spin–orbit Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the radial components of the SOC operator (12) are chosen to be analytical functions of the form whose parameters \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\{B^{n \ell, I}_{k}, \beta_{ k}^{n \ell, I}\}$\end{document} are determined through least‐squares fitting to the radial parts of the numerical Wood–Boring spin‐orbit operator of an atom I 73. The SOMF Hamiltonian has been used, too, in combination with effective core potentials 74,75. In this case, one has to make sure that a close correspondence exists between the valence orbitals of the all‐electron and the effective core potential calculations.…”
Section: Spin–orbit Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all wavefunction models of type   ,   and   (see next paragraph for model definitions) we used the exact two-component Hamiltonian scheme of Iliaš and Saue [50] where two-electron spin-same-orbit (SSO) and spin-other-orbit (SOO) corrections were either obtained by means of atomic mean-field integrals [51,52] (amf) or in a molecular mean-field approach [53] (mmf), based on the X2C transformation of the converged four-component Fock operator. For the models   and   molecular spinors were optimized through all-electron four-component Dirac-Coulomb Hartree-Fock calculations.…”
Section: Technical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the SCF level the error due to this neglect of twoelectron picture change can be reduced by constructing corrections to the untransformed two-electron term from atomic contributions. One example is the AMFI approach 30,31 in which the spin same-orbit and spin other-orbit contributions at the free-particle ͑2e-FP͒ level, arising from the Coulomb and Gaunt terms, respectively, 55 are constructed in a meanfield fashion based on spin-free second-order DKH atomic calculations. A straightforward improvement of this procedure, which also allows the inclusion of scalar relativistic corrections, is to rather construct these atomic contributions from an exact picture change transformation of the corresponding converged atomic HF or KS matrices.…”
Section: The Two-electron Interaction In a Two-component Relativismentioning
confidence: 99%