2011
DOI: 10.32917/hmj/1323700038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the combinatorial anabelian geometry of nodally nondegenerate outer representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, we then have to show that instead the centralizer of ι inΠ g (2g + 2) C is trivial. By the short exact sequence (15) and induction on n, this last claim is implied by the lemma: Lemma 6.6. For all 0 ≤ n ≤ 2g + 1 (where, for g = 1, we let n ≥ 1), the subgroup ι is self-normalizing inΠ C g,n · ι .…”
Section: To See the Other Inclusion Kerˆ Cmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To conclude, we then have to show that instead the centralizer of ι inΠ g (2g + 2) C is trivial. By the short exact sequence (15) and induction on n, this last claim is implied by the lemma: Lemma 6.6. For all 0 ≤ n ≤ 2g + 1 (where, for g = 1, we let n ≥ 1), the subgroup ι is self-normalizing inΠ C g,n · ι .…”
Section: To See the Other Inclusion Kerˆ Cmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Theorem 2.2 in [18]) and then extended by Hoshi and Mochizuki to the closed surface case (cf. Corollary 6.2 in[15] and Lemma 20 in[13]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It follows from the constructions of α 0 , α ∆ 2 that γ Y • α 0 and [α ∆ 2 ] • γ X coincide after composing with the natural morphism Out FC (∆ Y 2 ) → Out(∆ Y ). On the other hand, since Out FC (∆ Y 2 ) → Out(∆ Y ) is injective (cf., e.g., [5], Theorem A), we conclude that γ Y • α 0 = [α ∆ 2 ] • γ X . Therefore, by applying the natural isomorphisms Π X 2 ∼ = ∆ X 2 out G K and Π Y 2 ∼ = ∆ Y 2 out G L , we obtain an isomorphism Π X 2 ∼ = Π Y 2 , which satisfies the required uniqueness and compatibility properties (cf.…”
Section: Cuspidalization Problems For Hyperbolic Curvesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Since the natural morphism Out FC (∆ (X× K K\{x}) n−1 ) → Out FC (∆ (X× K K\{x}) n−2 ) is injective (cf. [5]), we may carry out a similar argument to the above discussion by replacing G K by Π X and ∆ X 2 by ∆ (X× K K\{x}) n−1 . Hence, for j = 1, · · · , n, we obtain an isomorphism α j n : Π Xn for i = 1, · · · , n − 1.…”
Section: Cuspidalization Problems For Hyperbolic Curvesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A weaker version of Theorems 4.1 and 4.2 was established by the authors in a previous version of this paper that was available through the authors' websites. At the time we wrote that we were not aware of the article [23] by Hoshi and Mochizuki and so the only homomorphisms ζ lmn we knew to be injective were ζ ∞,∞,∞ and ζ 2,3,∞ , a result due to Belyi himself. That was already enough to prove faithfulness on the whole set of quasiplatonic curves but not on the more restricted subsets presented here.…”
Section: Faithfulness Of the Action Of Gal(q/q) On Regular Dessinsmentioning
confidence: 99%