2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the comparison of the abrasive wear behavior of aluminum alloyed and standard Hadfield steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This means the presence of boron has minimum 2 effects: the first is improvement of dissolution of manganese carbides in microstructure and the second consist of modification of remaining carbide morphologies. The higher amounts of 0.007% boron content can create boron carbides which have opposite effect on toughness and impact resistance (Abbasi et al, 2010;Kuyucak and Zavadil, 2000). Figure 3 shows the Scanning Electron Microscopy images of samples with 0.0 to 0.007% Boron content after the heat treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means the presence of boron has minimum 2 effects: the first is improvement of dissolution of manganese carbides in microstructure and the second consist of modification of remaining carbide morphologies. The higher amounts of 0.007% boron content can create boron carbides which have opposite effect on toughness and impact resistance (Abbasi et al, 2010;Kuyucak and Zavadil, 2000). Figure 3 shows the Scanning Electron Microscopy images of samples with 0.0 to 0.007% Boron content after the heat treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9b) suggest that the plate-like cementite and cellular ledeburite reinforced hard layer is brittle and more susceptible to spalling and cracking. As for the Mn13 steel sample comprised of single austenite, although having excellent toughness, the lack of hard reinforcement and the insufficiently high sliding pressure to trigger work-hardening make it powerless to resist the shear forces from the counterpart [20]. This explains why some micro-cutting and severe adhesive wear characteristics are observed in Fig.…”
Section: Phase Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work hardening mechanisms, impact wear, abrasive wear and the alloying of austenitic manganese steel have been investigated by several researchers and results have shown that under repeated impact and abrasive wear it work hardens rapidly and displays remarkable toughness [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . Several other works on its surface treatment have also proved that surface treatment increases its surface hardness and wear resistance [22][23][24][25] . However, the rate of work hardening depends primarily on the amount of carbon in solution in the austenite matrix and the presence of a fine dispersion of carbides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%