2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2004.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the complexity of fixed parameter clique and dominating set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
98
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, these are computationally very challenging problems. Given an arbitrary template of size k and a graph with n nodes, the best known rigorous result for the subgraph isomorphism problem is obtained by Eisenbrand et al [10] with a running time of roughly O(n ωk/3 ) (which improves on the naive O(n k ) time), where ω denotes the exponent of the best possible matrix multiplication algorithm. If the template has an independent set of size s, Vassilevska et al [28] give an algorithm with an improved running time of O(2 s n k−s+3 k O (1) ); this is improved slightly by Kowaluk et al [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, these are computationally very challenging problems. Given an arbitrary template of size k and a graph with n nodes, the best known rigorous result for the subgraph isomorphism problem is obtained by Eisenbrand et al [10] with a running time of roughly O(n ωk/3 ) (which improves on the naive O(n k ) time), where ω denotes the exponent of the best possible matrix multiplication algorithm. If the template has an independent set of size s, Vassilevska et al [28] give an algorithm with an improved running time of O(2 s n k−s+3 k O (1) ); this is improved slightly by Kowaluk et al [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eisenbrand & Grandoni [9] slightly improve on these bounds for (3k + 2)-CLIQUE (with k ≥ 2) and for (3k + 1)-CLIQUE (with 1 ≤ k ≤ 5). In particular, for 4-CLIQUE [9] gives a time complexity of n 3.334 .…”
Section: Fact the 3k-clique Problem For A P-vertex Graph Can Be Solvmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Instead, we want to use matrix multiplication. We define three functions a 12 , a 13 , a 23 : V (G) × V (G) → N which we later interpret as matrices whose indices range over…”
Section: V1v2v3 ∈ {0 1} Indicates Whether the Mapping β(T) → {Vmentioning
confidence: 99%