2020
DOI: 10.4171/jca/39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the complexity of the cogrowth sequence

Abstract: Given a finitely generated group with generating set S, we study the cogrowth sequence, which is the number of words of length n over the alphabet S that are equal to one. This is related to the probability of return for walks in a Cayley graph with steps from S. We prove that the cogrowth sequence is not P-recursive when G is an amenable group of superpolynomial growth, answering a question of Garrabant and Pak. In addition, we compute the cogrowth for certain infinite families of free products of finite grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In §2.1 we work out several examples, which are listed in the statement of Theorem 1.2; The main result of §3 is a general bound on the degree of the minimial polynomial of co-growth series for the free products of finite groups, which gives Theorem 1.1 as a consequence. These results use ideas from free probability, which were suggested to two of the authors by one of the referees for the earlier paper [3]. In §4 we prove the gap result for radii of convergence given in Theorem 1.3, using the results from the preceding sections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In §2.1 we work out several examples, which are listed in the statement of Theorem 1.2; The main result of §3 is a general bound on the degree of the minimial polynomial of co-growth series for the free products of finite groups, which gives Theorem 1.1 as a consequence. These results use ideas from free probability, which were suggested to two of the authors by one of the referees for the earlier paper [3]. In §4 we prove the gap result for radii of convergence given in Theorem 1.3, using the results from the preceding sections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…While there is a strong overlap between the various notions of complexity (group theoretic, language theoretic, and complexity of power series), there are nevertheless some families of groups which are typically regarded as being structurally well behaved whose corresponding cogrowth series are complex according to our notion of complexity. For example, it is shown in [3] that a finitely generated amenable group that is not virtually nilpotent can never have a generating series that satisfies a non-trivial homogeneous linear differential equation with rational function coefficients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%