2017
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/aa8876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the computation of the disruption forces in tokamaks

Abstract: The currents and forces induced in the tokamak vacuum vessel (wall) during the disruption are calculated for different values of wall resistivity. Several consequences and new developments are derived from the general result that the global disruption force acting on the perfectly conducting wall must be exactly opposite to the similar force acting on the plasma, which is inherently small in tokamaks. This theoretical prediction is tested and confirmed here for the ITER tokamak with disruption modelled as the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the standard model of a 'circular' tokamak, it requires a pair of coupled kink modes with different (m, n), the poloidal and toroidal wave numbers. Also, in calculation of the wall reaction we have to treat it as a resistive conductor so that the wall sideways force is a function of the growth rate γ [32,[37][38][39], in contrast to γ-independent relations for F X given by (1) and derived in [31,33]. In [37] the study was performed for the locked exponentially growing modes, and here we extend it to the rotating modes assuming nonzero γ and ω.…”
Section: Incorporation Of the Condition [38]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the standard model of a 'circular' tokamak, it requires a pair of coupled kink modes with different (m, n), the poloidal and toroidal wave numbers. Also, in calculation of the wall reaction we have to treat it as a resistive conductor so that the wall sideways force is a function of the growth rate γ [32,[37][38][39], in contrast to γ-independent relations for F X given by (1) and derived in [31,33]. In [37] the study was performed for the locked exponentially growing modes, and here we extend it to the rotating modes assuming nonzero γ and ω.…”
Section: Incorporation Of the Condition [38]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the agreement in terms of the total toroidal current flowing in the vessel is good (figure 11(b)), both quantitatively (amplitude of the peaks) and qualitatively (time variations). To achieve this level of accuracy, it was necessary to include the effects of PF coil currents, using the experimentally measured values as input to the simulations; indeed, they have a significant effect in draining current from the vessel, thanks to the magnetic coupling, on time scales longer than the disruption, acting in practice as a disruption force damper [24].…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F ≡ (F x , F y , F z ), J is the current density, B is the total magnetic field and n is a unit vector perpendicular to the toroidal surface. Therefore, for time scales much shorter than τ w , the vessel forces remain small (F ≈ 0) since B remains approximately unchanged outside the wall (as observed in [15]). However, as it is deduced from (1) and it is shown in this paper, the force can arise after the field penetrates the wall even in the absence of plasma currents (this was also observed in [16]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%