1983
DOI: 10.1080/00036818308839474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the concavity of zeros of bessel functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The graphs in Fig. 1 complements those in [24, p. 510] where ±j νk is graphed against ν for k = 1, 2, 3, 4, and in [7] where j νκ is graphed against ν for various values of κ between 0 and 1. It is also worth mentioning that Olver [20] considered what amounts to j νκ for continuous κ while in [21], he considered it for continuous ν, both situations arising from a need to evaluate the zeros numerically.…”
Section: Bessel Functionsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The graphs in Fig. 1 complements those in [24, p. 510] where ±j νk is graphed against ν for k = 1, 2, 3, 4, and in [7] where j νκ is graphed against ν for various values of κ between 0 and 1. It is also worth mentioning that Olver [20] considered what amounts to j νκ for continuous κ while in [21], he considered it for continuous ν, both situations arising from a need to evaluate the zeros numerically.…”
Section: Bessel Functionsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…or, in terms of our present notation, Now the first term on the right here is negative [1] and the sum of the two remaining terms will certainly be negative provided that (3.9) from (3.4) and (3.6) and this is certainly negative in case -0.8 < v < 0. Thus the second derivative of p 2 with respect to v is negative at points where the first derivative is 0; hence there can be only one such point and it is a relative maximum.…”
Section: - /O N 2\2mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…we have g (ν) = dy ν1 /dν − π/4 which, in view of results in [4] decreases to the positive number 1−π/4, as ν → ∞. Thus g(ν) is increasing, g(− Watson [15, pp.…”
Section: Now If We Writementioning
confidence: 99%