2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the condensation/evaporation pressures and isosteric heats for argon adsorption in pores of different cross-sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No other significant differences in adsorption are observed and the normalized loops exhibit essentially the same shape, considering the much enlarged scale of the graph and the simplicity of the normalization procedure. This conclusion agrees with recent computer simulations of Ar adsorption in the open pores of nanometer size (∼10 nm) and with circular or triangular cross sections . The basis chosen for a quantitative comparison between pores of different shape is that they have the same surface area per unit volume.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No other significant differences in adsorption are observed and the normalized loops exhibit essentially the same shape, considering the much enlarged scale of the graph and the simplicity of the normalization procedure. This conclusion agrees with recent computer simulations of Ar adsorption in the open pores of nanometer size (∼10 nm) and with circular or triangular cross sections . The basis chosen for a quantitative comparison between pores of different shape is that they have the same surface area per unit volume.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This conclusion agrees with recent computer simulations of Ar adsorption in the open pores of nanometer size (∼10 nm) and with circular or triangular cross sections. 51 The basis chosen for a quantitative comparison between pores of different shape is that they have the same surface area per unit volume. At low pressures, the adsorption isotherms look different and the adsorbed mass on open triangular pores is larger than that on open circular pores.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are consistent with the data reported by other researchers. 44,45 This can be attributed to the fact that at low adsorbed amount, the enthalpy change associated with adsorption mainly arises from the contribution of solid−fluid interaction as the fluid molecules are adsorbed at the solid substrate. On the other hand, at larger adsorbed amounts, the enthalpy change mainly arises from the fluid−fluid interaction.…”
Section: Langmuirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GCMC method utilizes the general statistical mechanical relationship between the differential entropy and enthalpy and the fluctuations of the adsorbate density and energy in the course of simulation. The GCMC method has been employed widely to calculate the isosteric heat of adsorption of simple fluids on carbons, , zeolites, and mesoporous materials. Most of reported GCMC simulations are based on the idealized models of homogeneous surfaces and pore walls neglecting geometrical and energetic heterogeneity. This is why the simulation results agreed with the experimental only in the case of crystalline surfaces like graphite and highly graphitized carbons. , The importance of direct accounting of surface heterogeneity in GCMC simulations was recently shown by Kowalczyk et al drawing on the example of hybrid reverse MC structural models of highly graphitized and disordered carbon surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%