2004
DOI: 10.1086/423301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Constancy of the Solar Diameter. II.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
101
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
101
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The diameter appears to have changed either in phase with surface activity (Ulrich & Bertello 1995;Basu 1998;Emilio et al 2000;Noël 2004) or in antiphase with surface activity (Gilliland 1981;Sofia et al 1994;Laclare et al 1996;Li & Sofia 2001;Reis Neto et al 2003;Thuillier et al 2005;Egidi et al 2006). Some studies have detected no significant change at all (LaBonte & Howard 1981;Brown & Christensen-Dalsgaard 1998;Wittmann 2003;Kuhn et al 2004;Badache-Damiani & Rozelot 2006). …”
Section: ϫ3mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The diameter appears to have changed either in phase with surface activity (Ulrich & Bertello 1995;Basu 1998;Emilio et al 2000;Noël 2004) or in antiphase with surface activity (Gilliland 1981;Sofia et al 1994;Laclare et al 1996;Li & Sofia 2001;Reis Neto et al 2003;Thuillier et al 2005;Egidi et al 2006). Some studies have detected no significant change at all (LaBonte & Howard 1981;Brown & Christensen-Dalsgaard 1998;Wittmann 2003;Kuhn et al 2004;Badache-Damiani & Rozelot 2006). …”
Section: ϫ3mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Data from the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) instrument onboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SoHo) cover the whole solar cycle 23 and show no evidence of secular trends in the solar radius, or variations attributable to the 11 year cycle. Systematic changes in the solar radius with the sunspot cycle must be smaller than 23 milliarcsec (mas) peak-to-peak (Kuhn et al 2004;Bush et al 2010). Solar radius variations for different instruments are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Solar Radius Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is perhaps somewhat unsurprising-in our direct experience of seeing stellar disks, there is only the sun, which is very nearly a perfect sphere: on an average radius of 959 .28 ± 0 .15 (Kuhn et al 2004) there is only a variation of only 9.0 ± 1.8 mas (Rozelot et al 2003) from equator to pole, indicating an oblateness (b/a − 1) of less than 10 −5 . However, for a surprisingly non-trivial number of stars, this degree of oblateness is in excess of 20% and, in certain cases, even 30%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%