1968
DOI: 10.1137/0705041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Construction and Comparison of Difference Schemes

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
1,975
0
21

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,087 publications
(2,000 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
1,975
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyses focus on the accuracy and stability implied for components of simple linear systems (acoustic and gravity waves, and advection); and the performance of numerical implementations for idealised (dry) atmospheric tests, often compared to solutions from a very high-resolution highorder explicit RK method. Substantially different approaches have been recommended: some completely splitting the vertical and horizontal integrations using Strang-type splitting [8,97,100]; others proposing schemes that keep the vertical and horizontal solutions balanced in time, by integrating over the same time-interval, at each predictorstage [40,63,106]. In keeping with the semi-implicit approach (Sect.…”
Section: Horizontally-explicit Vertically-implicit (Hevi) Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses focus on the accuracy and stability implied for components of simple linear systems (acoustic and gravity waves, and advection); and the performance of numerical implementations for idealised (dry) atmospheric tests, often compared to solutions from a very high-resolution highorder explicit RK method. Substantially different approaches have been recommended: some completely splitting the vertical and horizontal integrations using Strang-type splitting [8,97,100]; others proposing schemes that keep the vertical and horizontal solutions balanced in time, by integrating over the same time-interval, at each predictorstage [40,63,106]. In keeping with the semi-implicit approach (Sect.…”
Section: Horizontally-explicit Vertically-implicit (Hevi) Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where γ m k is defined as in (15). This update corresponds to (16) for the onedimensional shallow water equations and (25) for the two-dimensional scalar advection equation.…”
Section: D Systems Of Equations: Application To Shallow Water Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dedicated methods chosen for each subsystem are then responsible for dealing with the fast scales associated with each one of them, in a separate manner, while the reconstruction of the global solution by the splitting scheme should guarantee an accurate description with error control of the global physical coupling, without being related to the stability constraints of the numerical resolution of each subsystem. A second order Strang scheme is then implemented [12] …”
Section: Adaptive Time Operator Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%