With the aid of ionic close packing ideal crystal lattices can be given to many distorted ionic crystal lattices. In consequence of distortion the actual lattices are mostly dilated compared to the ideal ones, so that the difference of the volumes associated with one anion of the actual and ideal lattice, respectively, is always satisfying the relation A V(X) > O. For every group of ionic compounds with the same anion but different cations of the same valency and coordination number and only slightly differing ionic radii the difference volume V (X) will be the same. With this supposition we were able to determine the ionic radii of the eations being present in rutile and its sister lattices and CaF~ lattices and further, the fact may be stated that for the cases revised here, mostly the ionic radii of AnRENS are most reliable. In the other cases, GOLDSCHMIDt's radii of intermediate values of the two have to be regarded as the real ones. Some deviation can be found for the ionic radii in the case of the compounds AB~X e in which the divalent cations ate Fe, Co, Ni or Mn. An explanation for this will be given later, h could be stated that the ionic radii have rather a fictitious meaning and their values vary depending on the coordination number as well as on the influenee of neighbouring cations, polarizability of the anions and on the relative number of cations and anions. The ionic radii redetermined in this paper ate summarized in the tables, where also a comparison with the data of GOLDSCHMIDT and AHRENS is given.The spatial arrangement in ionic crystals can be thought as approaching an arrangement of different charged spheres. Although the ions ate not really spheres, in the different crystal lattices constant ionic distances ate obtained in a good approximation if the coordination number and the degree of ionization Ÿ the same. In this sense the ions may be regarded as spheres to which well-defined ionic radii can be assigned.The first ionic radii were given by WASASTJERNA [1] who found the ionic refraction to be proportional to the volume, i. e. to the third power of the ionic radius. The ionic radii of 0 -2 and F-given by WASASTJER•A prove to be the most reliable ones still to-day and gire the starting point for the determination of the ionic radii of further ions.Ionic radii were determined by GOLDSCHralDT [2] in 1926 on the basis of experimental interionie distances taken from the simplest crystals (mostly with parameterfree structures) with the ionic radii F-: 1,33 A and 0 -2 :: 1,32 ~ given by WASASTSEnNA. Many ionic radii have been determined by GOLDSC~MIDT and the variation of the ionic radii with the coordination number was discovered by hito.PAI~LI~G [3] started in 1927 from the assumption that the size of th ions is determined by their outermost electrons. As first approximation thes